So, Twitter’s down today. (Everybody say booooo…) I feel a little lost, honestly. But my feed reader is getting major action, so that’s exciting.
I’ve seen talk recently about companies not needing their own websites. That instead, they just need to use all of the new media out there and be involved in “The Great Conversation” (capitals and snarkiness mine). Let the social web decide your brand. Be awesome enough that you don’t need to say anything about yourself.
I have a feeling this is one of those “let’s say something really different so that we’ll get a lot of traffic and be seen as innovative and controversial!” Because really. Come on.
Just a few reasons why the “all spokes, no wheel” method is crap
- You’re limiting your substance. Maybe you really love working within the boundaries of 140 characters. If that is your medium, go for it. But don’t let anyone else decide on the format for your work. YOU decide that.
- You have no glue to hold the other pieces together. There isn’t one cohesive “why” to all the “what” that you’re producing. Your story is scattered in fragments all over the place.
- You don’t have your own stage. Instead, you’re sharing one. Your website allows you to have a stage that you have some control over. It’s where you put your flag in the ground and say “This is me. This is what I stand for.”
- You’ve got to follow the pack. If Twitter dies or if everyone else decides that it’s time to move on to Bigger Better Things, then you’ve got to go where the people are. You may even have to start over.
- You’ve got to be omnipresent. If you don’t have a wheel, you better have a ton of spokes to support your work. Mainly so you don’t suffer huge losses if your platform of choice goes belly up. And so you can figure out where the pack is moving when it’s time to migrate.
- You’re putting yourself at the mercy of everyone. Am I the only one who’s noticed that there are weirdos out there? Spammers, hackers, and people who are just plain strange. Yeah, I realllllly want to give them something fun to do on their boring Tuesday afternoon. “Woohoo!!! Let’s mess up Sarah’s life. That would be fun!”
I’m sure I could come up with a list of 50 other reasons. I’m sort of baffled this conversation even exists, frankly. I’m really proud of the social web for becoming so mainstream, but even I have my limits.

I love this post, even if it just reaffirms that *I’m* not the crazy one!
Thanks, I’ve had a crazy-mad week (so much so that I didn’t even know Twitter was down today!) so it’s good to know I didn’t tip over the edge in end.
Hahaha…I think Twitter’s back up now, but for a good 3-4 hours, it was a no show. (And no…it’s THEM. THEY are always the crazy ones!) LOL
Very true Sarah, having your own platform means you’re not relying on anyone (except your web host!)
Your own platform also means that you control your content – nothing worse than carefully crafting all those tweets, only to find that Twitter dumps the oldest after a few months. You couldn’t write the next great novel like that.
.-= Ben´s last blog ..Facing Speaking Fear by Playing Your Own Part =-.
So true. Not have a website? Sort of like not having a home (or at least a storage container for the ardent traveler) where you keep your stuff and at least occasionally hang your hat (or check on it). It’s just folks thinking they need to say something “radical.” Or maybe they really believe it, but having a domain name certainly isn’t something that will become antiquated in the near future. Anything’s possible in the distance, of course, but not right now.
This makes me think of how more people are completely ditching the tangible business cards (and trading solely electronically/digitally). What’s your opinion of that?
I hope you’ll forgive my slightly woo-woo moment, but all this talk of spokes and wheels reminded me of the first two lines of my favorite verse from the Tao Te Ching:
Thirty spokes share the wheel’s hub;
It is the center hole that makes it useful.
I agree; it’s all about the hub, baby. Which is not to say that my own hub is getting all the attention it deserves, but that’s another story…
Thanks for injecting some solid sense into the runaway hype, Sarah. Social media is useful for spreading the message via easily digestible headlines and sound bites; the notion that it should *become* the message — essentially supplanting both content and context — is a whole different matter. (Appetizer vs. main course, if you will.)
.-= Kari Geltemeyer´s last blog ..To live content =-.
Hey now, don’t be too hard on those of us that are “Just plain strange”. We ARE the ones who often make you smile!! But I agree with the rest of the post. Plus I have sincere loathing for the spammers who think a single male on the internet is dying to pay a female to talk to them!! Heck, some of us are strange enough women will pay us….. to NOT talk to them! Hope ya smiled again. Keep up the good work.
.-= Steve “Dream” Weaver´s last blog ..Giving Up, Quitting and a dog =-.
Great post Sarah, nicely said. Crisp and clean – you need a hub to hold everything together. We all do.
You forgot two other good reasons that I constantly use when talking to people:
1. Your stage is the only place you have control
2. Look at the backbone of some of these companies. This is just good sound research. Twitter has yet to make a profit or figure out how, and YouTube is not much different. Companies can only run on vapors for so long. You don’t want your homebase to be someplace that up and dries up, or starts charging all of a sudden.
Patrick
http://patrickallmond.com
.-= Patrick Allmond´s last blog ..Who wants a google wave invite and why? =-.